Started By
Message

re: Loyola Marymount to cut 6 sports in response to NIL

Posted on 1/27/24 at 8:39 am to
Posted by STATEofMIND
Member since Oct 2012
4234 posts
Posted on 1/27/24 at 8:39 am to
quote:

They should be, but maybe their agents are taking care of it???



This makes sense. I just didn’t know if it was being labeled as “charitable gifts,” “nonprofit cost,” or “payroll.”
Posted by BCreed1
Alabama
Member since Jan 2024
1292 posts
Posted on 1/27/24 at 8:42 am to
I was shocked they had agents. I thought this was still a violation.
Posted by TideWarrior
Asheville/Chapel Hill NC
Member since Sep 2009
11841 posts
Posted on 1/27/24 at 8:49 am to
quote:

This makes sense. I just didn’t know if it was being labeled as “charitable gifts,” “nonprofit cost,” or “payroll.”


IIRC NIL is considered taxable income filed under self-employment tax status. Not sure how the Jock tax is being applied but I assume their financial advisers/agents are dealing with that.

I would be curious as these athletes sign a NLI to get a guaranteed scholarship offer to attend the college they pick. Could the NLI still be signed to enforce a roster spot and hold the player committed without a financial dollar(scholarship) being included with the NLI. Meaning the NLI is a binding contract we currently have but guarantees a financial scholarship, but if players are receiving a NIL package worth more than needed to attend a university could the NLI be created to still be binding but yet not be an 85 counter (no scholarship) so technically a school could offer more financial scholarships with a larger roster?
This post was edited on 1/27/24 at 8:51 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter