Started By
Message

re: Darius Miles

Posted on 4/2/24 at 7:09 am to
Posted by Robot Santa
Member since Oct 2009
44403 posts
Posted on 4/2/24 at 7:09 am to
No, because it only applies to testimony made under oath when that testimony was subject to cross-examination.
This post was edited on 4/2/24 at 7:10 am
Posted by JustGetItRight
Member since Jan 2012
15715 posts
Posted on 4/2/24 at 7:56 am to
quote:

No, because it only applies to testimony made under oath when that testimony was subject to cross-examination.


There are even a few exceptions to that one as well. Dying declarations, for example, are admissible.
Posted by BFANLC
The Beach
Member since Oct 2007
18119 posts
Posted on 4/2/24 at 8:13 am to
If you were a defendant wouldn't you want that cross examination to be in front of a jury? You've just been denied that right.

Just another example of the government trying to create a loop hole in an iron clad right.

Same as what they've done with the double jeopardy law exemptions.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter