Started By
Message

re: Players may be FORCED to play in bowl games

Posted on 5/4/24 at 7:29 pm to
Posted by Porker Face
Eden Isle
Member since Feb 2012
15349 posts
Posted on 5/4/24 at 7:29 pm to
They aren't forced, they will just lose money for violating their contract

That isn't "forced"
Posted by wadewilson
Member since Sep 2009
36590 posts
Posted on 5/4/24 at 7:34 pm to
quote:

Ole Miss will make it to Atlanta one day....


Will they, though?
Posted by southernboisb
Member since Dec 2012
7326 posts
Posted on 5/4/24 at 7:35 pm to
You can't opt out during the season, so...?
Posted by PerrillouxToTexas
Member since Sep 2022
5329 posts
Posted on 5/4/24 at 7:39 pm to
quote:

They aren't forced, they will just lose money for violating their contract


if i'm a head coach or NIL collective or whatever, i don't put this type of stipulation in the contracts. instant recruiting advantage.
Posted by Oklahomey
Bucksnort, TN
Member since Mar 2013
5028 posts
Posted on 5/4/24 at 7:41 pm to
As an OU fan, if the Sooners are NOT in a CFP game, I still get excited because it’s a chance to win something to end on a high note. A bowl win used to mean something big. Perhaps the abundance of bowls has made the bowl experience lose its luster but to me as a fan it still has meaning.
Posted by swampvol1
Member since Oct 2015
1306 posts
Posted on 5/4/24 at 7:42 pm to
One can only dream.
Posted by Clark14
L.A.Hog
Member since Dec 2014
19563 posts
Posted on 5/4/24 at 7:55 pm to
quote:

You can't opt out during the season, so...?


Our entire team mentally checked out toward the end of last year. Especially the offense. It was obvious.
Posted by Marty Dawg
Ball Ground
Member since Oct 2020
996 posts
Posted on 5/4/24 at 8:27 pm to
quote:

The article linked below is from Outkick. The crux of it is this quote from Ross Dellinger:


Oh so literally fake news? Got it
Posted by swinetime
Member since Apr 2013
4478 posts
Posted on 5/4/24 at 8:51 pm to
I expect to see many phantom injuries prior to meaningless bowl games
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
50589 posts
Posted on 5/4/24 at 9:54 pm to
Seems reasonable.
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
50589 posts
Posted on 5/4/24 at 9:55 pm to
quote:

You can force them to play but you cannot make them put any effort into it.


Yes, I'm sure players who are hoping to transfer or go pro will absolutely be willing to sandbag their in-game performance to their own detriment out of spite.
Posted by Murph4HOF
A-T-L-A-N-T-A (that's where I stay)
Member since Sep 2019
11259 posts
Posted on 5/4/24 at 9:57 pm to
quote:

Couldn't they just claim they're hurt?
Posted by Lsuhoohoo
Member since Sep 2007
94605 posts
Posted on 5/4/24 at 10:00 pm to
quote:

Players may be FORCED to play in bowl games



And this will get the ball rolling on a college football players union.

Can't wait until the strike season while new terms of a CBA are agreed to.
Posted by LouisvilleKat
Member since Oct 2016
18246 posts
Posted on 5/4/24 at 10:11 pm to
I mean they can also hit the transfer portal the minute they see a stipulation like that and play for someone else who doesnt require it. If a players good enough there's always somebody else willing to put up with their demands.
Posted by plazadweller
South Georgia
Member since Jul 2011
11457 posts
Posted on 5/4/24 at 10:13 pm to
NY6 Bowls matter? If you aren’t in the playoff the game doesn’t matter
Posted by plazadweller
South Georgia
Member since Jul 2011
11457 posts
Posted on 5/4/24 at 10:16 pm to
There are ways to take it even further than just forcing them to play…like going after NIL $ if are healthy and do not play
Posted by Landmass
Member since Jun 2013
18179 posts
Posted on 5/4/24 at 10:18 pm to
quote:

NY6 Bowls matter? If you aren’t in the playoff the game doesn’t matter


We, traditionally, have very few opt outs. Why don't Auburn players want to win the game for Auburn?
Posted by ChexMix
Taste the Deliciousness
Member since Apr 2014
25130 posts
Posted on 5/4/24 at 10:22 pm to
quote:

Players may be FORCED to play in bowl games
Good.

frick those quitters. Sitting on the sidelines while their teammates put it on the line for a bowl game that goes into the record books.
Posted by TigerWoodlands
The Woodlands
Member since Dec 2008
862 posts
Posted on 5/4/24 at 10:34 pm to
Seems like this would almost guarantee players associations and player representatives if we’re talking contracts? Happy to be wrong.
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
66734 posts
Posted on 5/4/24 at 10:52 pm to
I mean that’s between the players and their sponsors.

if thr NCAA just pays the players that’s not really NIL anymore

I also don’t see many labor agreement contracts where you lose all/most your money for not performing 1/13th your obligations.

Would be a terrible negotiation for players.
This post was edited on 5/4/24 at 10:53 pm
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter