Started By
Message

re: Best home field advantage last 5 years in the SEC

Posted on 5/16/24 at 9:33 am to
Posted by Ptins944
Member since Jan 2019
1466 posts
Posted on 5/16/24 at 9:33 am to
quote:

All I gotta say about that graph is Texas and OU are going to find out first-hand what it's like to "play on the road" week-in and week-out in this league. It will not be another day in Romper Rooom Land as they've enjoyed for their histories.
NONE of you gave Texas a chance against Alabama at home last year, and Texas went in and took their manhood and their lunch money, giving them the worst arse kicking since Saban came to town.

No "Horns Down" at the end of the game, 'cause all the Alabama fans had already left.

On the field talent and execution >> loud, drunk fans.

There is nothing in the SEC that compares to the wind in Oklahoma. Texas plays them in Dallas, you don't get that luxury. You guys get to see first hand "... where the wind comes sweepin' down the plain."

Posted by idlewatcher
County Jail
Member since Jan 2012
79391 posts
Posted on 5/16/24 at 9:34 am to
Aggie's homefield advantage was much higher than I expected.
:golf clap:
Posted by Insurancerebel
Madison
Member since Aug 2021
1587 posts
Posted on 5/16/24 at 10:43 am to
Pretty impressed with OLE MISS. 6 of the 8 losses came in 19 and 20.
Bama and MSU only home losses 21,22, and 23. LK has really turned OM around.


Posted by wdhalgren
Member since May 2013
3057 posts
Posted on 5/16/24 at 11:17 am to
Four top 10 teams at home in 5 years isn't bad. Would've been 5 if we played home and away with Florida. Other than Georgia, there have been 12 SEC teams that finished ranked in the top 10 since 2019, and Georgia played 9 of them, plus one of them twice in the same season.
This post was edited on 5/16/24 at 11:34 am
Posted by MedDawg
Member since Dec 2009
4469 posts
Posted on 5/16/24 at 12:04 pm to
State has had four head coaches during that time (starting 2017), now on our fifth.
Posted by CharlotteSooner
Member since Mar 2016
11100 posts
Posted on 5/16/24 at 12:09 pm to
quote:

It isn't about 1 week anymore.


The BIG XII has never been "about 1 week".

That's a narrative you people made up entirely on your own.
This post was edited on 5/16/24 at 12:14 pm
Posted by meansonny
ATL
Member since Sep 2012
25884 posts
Posted on 5/16/24 at 1:01 pm to
quote:

The BIG XII has never been "about 1 week".


Agree to disagree
quote:

That's a narrative you people made up entirely on your own


Nothing is made up.
The reality is that nothing about the big xii is adopted. No one buys the strength of the conference. It is exactly why the conference has fallen apart. Because no one had faith in it.

We don't need to make anything up when we refuse to buy the lies from butthurt Okie fans.
Posted by FireDanMullen
Member since Dec 2020
2839 posts
Posted on 5/16/24 at 1:04 pm to
quote:

Tell me about it. Could you imagine if any of those teams had to play in Tuscaloosa in 2023? They would've been SLAUGHTERED, right? Right??? Oh... well, at least Bama had a bad year and lost multiple games against other SEC opponents, right? Right???


Your first good team since 2009 lost to Washington in a game that the Huskies tried desperately to hand over to you.
This post was edited on 5/16/24 at 1:06 pm
Posted by CharlotteSooner
Member since Mar 2016
11100 posts
Posted on 5/16/24 at 2:21 pm to
quote:

Agree to disagree


You don't have the knowledge or the experience to "disagree". You never played in the BIG XII at any time during its existence. You just want to run with your stupid narrative.
This post was edited on 5/16/24 at 2:22 pm
Posted by AwgustaDawg
CSRA
Member since Jan 2023
7349 posts
Posted on 5/16/24 at 2:45 pm to
quote:

All I gotta say about that graph is Texas and OU are going to find out first-hand what it's like to "play on the road" week-in and week-out in this league. It will not be another day in Romper Rooom Land as they've enjoyed for their histories.


Texas and OU are a combined 246-106 against ATM, Arkansas and Missouri. Nary a one of those teams save Missouri has made a peep in the SEC since joining and Missouri was pretty good when UGA, UF and Tennessee all sucked and sucked hard. Both UT and OU have similar records against the historical middle of the pack teams they played week in and week out during the entirety of their history. They can't have any idea of the gauntlet they are facing looks like week in and week out...historically they played a one or sometimes 2 game season against teams that OCCASIONALLY had similar talent. They will now do so every weekend. They will do better than the other 3 because they have generally better talent but they are not going to out talent Alabama, UGA, LSU, Auburn, Florida and Tennessee on a regular basis like they have Kansas and K State and Texas Tech and Oklahoma State.
Posted by AwgustaDawg
CSRA
Member since Jan 2023
7349 posts
Posted on 5/16/24 at 2:57 pm to
quote:

Tell me about it. Could you imagine if any of those teams had to play in Tuscaloosa in 2023? They would've been SLAUGHTERED, right? Right???

Oh... well, at least Bama had a bad year and lost multiple games against other SEC opponents, right? Right???

Oh...


Using that logic the PAC 12 was better than the Big 12 and Washington better than Texas because when they played Washington prevailed.


What that logic fails to address is Texas did indeed beat Alabama in Tuscaloosa in what, week 2 of the regular season? Then fell to Oklahoma who lost to such gauntlets as Kansas and Oklahoma State and Texas did not face a team that finished in the top 25 until they lost to Washington. They did not beat Alabama in late October after playing in Baton Rouge and Knoxville and even Lexington where the Wildcats have more talent than anyone UT and OU played regularly prior to next year that was not Texas or OU. It ain't close...the talent and the coaching in the SEC is heads and shoulders better than that in the Big 12 or ANY conference that OU and UT played in historically. At best OU is in the bottom half of the middle and Texas is around the 3rd or 4th most talented team in the conference and closed to 4 and 5 than they are to 1 and 2. It ain't the same game.
Posted by AwgustaDawg
CSRA
Member since Jan 2023
7349 posts
Posted on 5/16/24 at 2:58 pm to
quote:

He did.

It isn't about 1 week anymore.

You hit "submit" too quickly.
Or your reading comprehension is on a Kenny Lofton level.



Its neither...they sincerely think playing in Starkevegas and Lexington is akin to playing in Lubbock and Manhattan....
Posted by AwgustaDawg
CSRA
Member since Jan 2023
7349 posts
Posted on 5/16/24 at 3:04 pm to
quote:

The BIG XII has never been "about 1 week".

That's a narrative you people made up entirely on your own.


The record speaks for itself....historically Texas, Oklahoma and Nebraska only played one another and a bunch of cup cakes who have never done anything significant in CFB. The numbers are readily available.
Posted by CharlotteSooner
Member since Mar 2016
11100 posts
Posted on 5/16/24 at 3:05 pm to
quote:

The record speaks for itself....historically Texas, Oklahoma and Nebraska only played one another and a bunch of cup cakes who have never done anything significant in CFB. The numbers are readily available.


'

So post your stupid "numbers" for everybody to see.
Posted by AwgustaDawg
CSRA
Member since Jan 2023
7349 posts
Posted on 5/16/24 at 3:07 pm to
quote:

Nothing is made up.
The reality is that nothing about the big xii is adopted. No one buys the strength of the conference. It is exactly why the conference has fallen apart. Because no one had faith in it.

We don't need to make anything up when we refuse to buy the lies from butthurt Okie fans.


The truth of the matter is that every conference that Texas and Oklahoma have ever been in fell apart because the other programs did not have the dedication to football that it took to be competitive.....no one outside of Texas and Oklahoma cared. The SEC is the polar opposite of this....and it is the reason it is the best conference in College Football and has been form some time. If the Big whatever number you like or the SWC weren't one team conferences they would still exist as the SEC and the Big 10 do.
Posted by CharlotteSooner
Member since Mar 2016
11100 posts
Posted on 5/16/24 at 3:12 pm to
quote:

The truth of the matter is that every conference that Texas and Oklahoma have ever been in fell apart because the other programs did not have the dedication to football that it took to be competitive.....no one outside of Texas and Oklahoma cared.


This is complete nonsense.
Posted by AwgustaDawg
CSRA
Member since Jan 2023
7349 posts
Posted on 5/16/24 at 3:12 pm to
quote:

'

So post your stupid "numbers" for everybody to see.



Everyone HAS seen them....everyone knows that every conference OU and UT have belonged to or either defunct or mere images of a real conference because they only had one program in them that was competitive. When Texas joined the Big 12 that changed but Texas sucked arse almost the entirety of that time so it was still a one team conference. It just ain't the same...there is a reason the SEC is universally recognized as the best conference in CFB and it is exactly the reason OU and UT abandoned the Big 12 because they could see the writing on the wall...it is better to be a middle of the pack SEC program than a dominant program in a conference with Kansas and K State and Texas Tech....it simply is not the same, the numbers are readily available and even the powers that be at OU and UT recognize it or they would not have jumped ship.....
Posted by AwgustaDawg
CSRA
Member since Jan 2023
7349 posts
Posted on 5/16/24 at 3:22 pm to
quote:

So post your stupid "numbers" for everybody to see.


Here's one glaring one....in the last 50 years 5 SEC teams have won 20 National Titles. Texas and Oklahoma have combined for 4(?). If you toss Florida State and Clemson and even fricking lowly Georgia Tech into the mix, programs that SEC teams play ANNUALLY as well as a SEC schedule teams from the region that was the SEC before expansion have won 26 National Titles. If you really want to stretch it you can toss Nebraska into the OU/UT bracket. That makes it 26 - 6 over a 50 year stretch...the numbers are even worse more recently. It just ain't the same.....and anyone who has an CFB knowledge knows it just ain't the same.....
Posted by AwgustaDawg
CSRA
Member since Jan 2023
7349 posts
Posted on 5/16/24 at 3:24 pm to
quote:

Here's one glaring one....in the last 50 years 5 SEC teams have won 20 National Titles. Texas and Oklahoma have combined for 4(?). If you toss Florida State and Clemson and even fricking lowly Georgia Tech into the mix, programs that SEC teams play ANNUALLY as well as a SEC schedule teams from the region that was the SEC before expansion have won 26 National Titles. If you really want to stretch it you can toss Nebraska into the OU/UT bracket. That makes it 26 - 6 over a 50 year stretch...the numbers are even worse more recently. It just ain't the same.....and anyone who has an CFB knowledge knows it just ain't the same.....



Also keep in mind that those 5 SEC teams who won 20 of 50 national titles also play one another EVERY YEAR! For ALL of those years UGA played UF and Auburn and recently Tennessee. For all those years Alabama played Tenessee, Auburn and LSU...and they all played one another regularly.....Texas and Oklahoma and Nebraska ONLY played one another and managed 6 titles in that period....it just aint the same.
Posted by CharlotteSooner
Member since Mar 2016
11100 posts
Posted on 5/16/24 at 3:25 pm to
quote:

Everyone HAS seen them....


I havent seen "them" and I want you to post "them" because I have no idea what you're talking about and neither do you apparently.


quote:

everyone knows that every conference OU and UT have belonged to or either defunct or mere images of a real conference because they only had one program in them that was competitive.




"Everyone knows" huh?

Neither the former BIG 8 nor the former SWC were "one program that was competitive" conferences, dipshit. You don't even know who was in the BIG 8 OR the SWC.



quote:

When Texas joined the Big 12 that changed but Texas sucked arse almost the entirety of that time so it was still a one team conference.


BZZZZZT! Wrong again. Nothing changed at all when texsa joined the conference. Nebraska, Colorado, and K-State were the dominant powers in what became the BIG XII North at the time the BIG XII was formed.

quote:

It just ain't the same...there is a reason the SEC is universally recognized as the best conference in CFB and it is exactly the reason OU and UT abandoned the Big 12 because they could see the writing on the wall...it is better to be a middle of the pack SEC program than a dominant program in a conference with Kansas and K State and Texas Tech...


Oklahoma and texsa didn't join the SEC because they think it's "better to be a middle of the pack SEC program".

You're laughably low IQ and you're just making all this up.

quote:

it simply is not the same, the numbers are readily available and even the powers that be at OU and UT recognize it or they would not have jumped ship.....


Again, what numbers? I want you to post those "numbers" everybody knows about.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter