Started By
Message

re: Darius garland or Trae young

Posted on 5/17/24 at 10:41 am to
Posted by Epic Cajun
Lafayette, LA
Member since Feb 2013
32811 posts
Posted on 5/17/24 at 10:41 am to
quote:

Hence why there are reports more GMs seem to view BI as more valuable.

You may want to re-read that report. A wider range of teams interested does not necessarily mean that he is more valuable. That just means that he's easier to fit onto a given team.
Posted by Townedrunkard
Member since Jan 2019
9020 posts
Posted on 5/17/24 at 11:43 am to
quote:

You may want to re-read that report. A wider range of teams interested does not necessarily mean that he is more valuable. That just means that he's easier to fit onto a given team.


SFP doesn’t seem to grasp that concept. Teams that have decent pgs or top level scoring sgs will have no use for him. Combine that with his salary and the other reasons (defense deficiencies) and it will suppress his market. Our team is perfectly set up to fit him. Herb and Trey are more 3&D guys.

There are more teams that can easily integrate BI as a # 2 or #3 than having to remake an entire lineup to fit Trae. It just so happens our roster is tailor made for him and he’s a better player and fit than BI is for our team.,

This should be the easiest no brainer move of Griffs career. But then again I thought the same thing about trading Lauri for Ball at the time and he fricked that up….
This post was edited on 5/17/24 at 11:49 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram