Started By
Message

re: Cohen: The payment was delayed in election interference trial, it only matter if Trump won

Posted on 5/13/24 at 4:16 pm to
Posted by ForeverGator
Elite 8 - 2020 Worst SECRant Poster
Member since Nov 2012
13130 posts
Posted on 5/13/24 at 4:16 pm to
quote:

They are trying to prove it was for the election and Trump team is trying to prove it was personal. If it was for the election you would want to shut someone up before people voted not after. Also why would you pay someone to keep quiet if you already won and it would no longer effect the election unless it was because you didn’t want your wife to find out



Except he's tying the payment directly to the election by saying delay the payment until after the election and why.... that strengthens the prosecutor's argument of tying the payment to the election and it's not a personal payment.
Posted by RaoulDuke504
Member since Aug 2023
1037 posts
Posted on 5/13/24 at 4:20 pm to
quote:

Except he's tying the payment directly to the election by saying delay the payment until after the election and why.... that strengthens the prosecutor's argument of tying the payment to the election and it's not a personal payment.


That makes no sense you shut someone up before the election not after
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram